Gregory Hoffman

From Nathania, Nathan Larson's bliki
Jump to: navigation, search

Gregory Hoffman is a prisoner about whom Nathan Larson wrote on 1 July 2015:

Gregory Hoffman is my new hero. He was sentenced to 25 years and $150,000 in restitution for tracking down the infamous Vicky, one of the two rather high-profile and litigious "victims" after whom were named the Amy and Vicky Child Pornography Victim Restitution Improvement Act which is currently pending before Congress, and trying to talk some sense into her. I've heard from numerous people who have seen the Vicky series that it's evident from her body language, mannerisms, etc. that she was enjoying what was happening. That's why those videos are so popular, and became some of the most widely distributed on the Internet.

I'm going to write him a letter and tell him that even if he never accomplishes anything else for the rest of his life, that one act alone was cool enough to justify his existence. I have to admire his persistence and resourcefulness in devoting years of his life to finding her, and not giving up till he succeeded.

I don't believe he stalked her. Stalking involves placing another person in reasonable fear of death, criminal sexual assault, or bodily injury. At most, he harassed her. But because the government thought he inflicted "substantial emotional distress," he now has to spend a couple decades in prison (which can be a substantially emotionally distressing situation).

Society wants to silence people like Socrates or Gregory Hoffman who upset people by candidly telling the truth as they see it. I was just reading his plea agreement: ---

On July 26, 2007, at approximately 1:46 p.m., defendant Greg Hoffman, using MySpace account with user name "Greg," friend number 190220390 and web address, contacted "K," via her MySpace account. "K" is a victim of a known child pornography series. She was 9 and 10 years old during the time that the images in the series were produced. Defendant emailed the victim writing; "hello, [victim's name], I am interested to know something about you. Is your iast name [victim's last name]?"

On June 27, 2007, at approximately 7:24 a.m., defendant, utilizing a Myspace account with web address; emailed "K" through her MySpace account writing; "how come you blocked me [victim's name]? I wanna know why u plan to testify against ur step dad. Cuz in all ur videos u seemed very willing and went along with it. I've been looking for you for almost 5 years and you don't even have the fortitude to confront the truth. You are a COWARD and you know that the truth is you don't wanna see your step dad go to prison. Why would you speak out against him on national TV? I think you are angered because he let the whole world and jus so you know l loved and adored those videos very much. He jus wanted to show the world how gorgeous u really were. Why is that such a crime?? Stop listening to what others tell you and stand on your own and formulate your own opinion. Jus make sure you have thought about it extensively before you do. I really like u a lot, I am here to talk to u as a friend if u need one to talk to. Don't be embarrassed or ashamed about your past with others. Shutting the world out is a safeplay and I don't blame you for doing that, but I want u to talk to me about everything going on in ur life now. l am kinda curious as to why ur step dad called you [name of series]."

On June 27, 2007, at approximately 9:56 p.m. defendant emailed "K" through her Myspace account with a subject heading; "hey plz add me I wanna see ur new pictures." On the same date, at approximately 10:03 p.m., defendant emailed the victim through her MySpace account with a subject heading; "hi again sexy are u surprised I knew who u were? i bet i might be the only person who actually knows ur myspace huh? that's cuz I'm smaht lol" and "u should talk 2 me."

On June 29, 2007, at approximately 8:03 p.m., defendant emailed "K" through her MySpace account. The email message; "XXX star hey want me to come visit u?" was posted in the subject heading without a narrative.

On July 1, 2007, at approximately 6:18 p.m., defendant emailed "K's" friend, through her MySpace account. "K's" friend lists "K" as her "hero on her Myspace account. Defendant emailed "K's" friend; "u know [victim's name]? Jus curious." On the same date at approximately 10:23 p.m., defendant emailed "K's" friend, "shes a porn star lol." At approximately 10:33 p.m., defendant emailed "K's" friend, "her step dad made her that way."

On July 2, 2007, at approximately 12:07 a.m., defendant emailed "K's" friend, "how come he called her Vicky or was that someone else who came up with that name as an alias?" On the same date, at approximately 12:19 a.m., "Greg" emailed "K's" friend, who was a minor at the time, "are these all the same person?" Attached to the email was the link; The link revealed a collage image of 5 photographs of a similar looking female, 2 of which have been positively identified as "K," depicted in the known series of child pornographic images and videos. This series was not produced in Nevada. One of the known images from this series that defendant sent to "K's" friend, who was a minor, is a "still" captioned photograph of a video of a prepubescent "K" performing oral sex on an adult male.

On July 2, 2007, at approximately 4:10 p.m., "K's" friend emailed a response to defendant's email attachment, "I haven't looked at them yet, where did you get them." On the same date, at approximately 4:12 p.m., defendant emailed "K's" friend, "snagged them off video so I dunno it looks like her but I wasn't sure." On the same date, at approximately 4:13 p.m., "K's" friend emailed defendant, "what video, the americas most wanted video?" On the same date, at approximately 4:21 p.m., defendant emailed "K's" friend, "no her porn vids, but one of those pics is of her on americas most wanted the others are from videos."

On July 8, 2007, at approximately 8:55 a.m., defendant emailed "K" through her MySpace account. His e-mail had a subject heading of "new porno," and the body of the e-mail said, "I wanna make a new porno of u and me." On the same date, at approximately 8:57 a.m., defendant emailed "K" through her MySpace account with a subject heading, "i promise u i will" and a narrative statement, "i saw the way u suck cock and i saw the way u took cock in ur ass and i saw the way u got ur pussy eaten out. u and me will make the best new porno ever." On the same date, at approximately 9:00 a.m., defendant emailed "K" through her Myspace account with a subject heading of "cell" and a narrative statement, "hey gimmie ur cell number."